Also known by its English adaptation title, 'The Substitute' arc, the first Bleach story arc is twenty episodes in length and covers manga chapters 1 through 70. It initially aired in Japan from October 2004 through February 2005 and in the US from September 2006 to January 2007. You are reading Bleach Chapter 634 in English. Read Chapter 634.000 of Bleach manga online on for free. There might be spoilers in the comment section, so don't read the comments before reading the chapter.
| List of Bleach volumes is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| WikiProject Anime and manga / Bleach | (Rated List-class, Low-importance) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
| WikiProject Lists | (Rated List-class, Low-importance) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| List of Bleach volumes received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Archives | |
|---|---|
|
Tankobon links[edit]
Isnt the word tankobon linked too many times? It is used in several volumes, and I think we should use the tankobon names for the chapters. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:01, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Looks like the linking has already been fixed. I would agree on the chapter names. Since the list is organized by volume, they should use those names, with a footnote noting that in serialization, the name was x. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 19:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Wanna try a peer review?[edit]
I was interested in requesting a peer review to know what fixes it may require. Do you agree?Tintor2 (talk) 19:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. I know one comment I would make myself would be that the chapter names should be using proper casing instead of this mixed up mix of all uppers and all lowers. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 19:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I think a peer review is definitely appropriate. Quite a lot of work has been done to get it this far. Cheers! ----–m.f(t • c) 20:08, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Splitting[edit]
The article has become 79 kylobites long. With more archiving refs or new volumes it will very heavy. As such, I purpose we split the first 21 volumes from this list into List of Bleach chapters (1–187). Thus, this list should be moved to List of Bleach manga volumes. Please comment.Tintor2 (talk) 20:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- Why 21 volumes and not 20 or 25? Goodraise 21:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- The English box set contains volumes 1-21, so it seems like a good place. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 21:42, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- The page is currently 80K. We're not hitting WP:SIZE problems at the moment, so I don't think splitting is needed right now. — sephiroth bcr(converse) 23:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- but, i do agree it would be a nice thing to do —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.89.110.40 (talk) 01:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Why would it be a nice thing to do? What's the deal with splitting up the chapters, it's a terrible idea, they work much better as only one article. Naruto is the only forgivable one because the series is split up into 2 parts, but Bleach is not. 173.79.31.198 (talk) 15:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
- Did you read the comments above? The article is 80 kylobites long causing it to be very long and slow to work with. Naruto is not the only list to have been splitted, see List of One Piece manga volumes. Now, the article does not have this issue, but with a new volume released it will have it.Tintor2 (talk) 17:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, but I disagree with One Piece being split, but I was too late to get involved with that 173.79.31.198 (talk) 00:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- Your argument seems WP:I just don't like it. The One Piece list was splitted for good due to the length from the series. We ll need to split this article too when it becomes a bit longer.Tintor2 (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Bleach Manga All Chapters
- If I might interject here, is there any reason the list couldn't be sectioned off, similar to what I did (albeit out of necessity) on List of Oh My Goddess! chapters? 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 17:21, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- No idea. I guess this could help readers.Tintor2 (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Update: The article is already 92 kylobites long. Should we wait more for a split?Tintor2 (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- That this list is featured makes it somewhat of a special case. (We wouldn't want to go through the hassle of doing several FLRCs if it wasn't necessary, would we?) Just wait till the series hits 50 volumes. That'll make for three decently sized sub-lists and, at that point, I doubt you'll get much of an argument about the issue. Goodraise 08:51, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Update: The article is already 92 kylobites long. Should we wait more for a split?Tintor2 (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- No idea. I guess this could help readers.Tintor2 (talk) 20:12, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
It may be time to reconsider splitting the article, being over 100 Kb and 50 volumes can make 3 decent size lists. DragonZero (Talk·Contribs) 00:26, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Jeez, it's been so long that I don't remember how many volumes should the sublist be composed. Tje English box set contains volumes 1-21, while in most cases, chapters split lead to 20 volumes.Tintor2 (talk) 01:38, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- If there isn't an MoS for this, I would personally keep 1-21 together since they mark one whole arc and are gathered into a box set by Viz. Try checking with the project. DragonZero (Talk·Contribs) 02:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Free Bleach Manga
I threw the first coin, but I have doubts about the second one. Does it sound right that List of Bleach chapters (188–367) occupies vols. 22-42? I have even more doubts whether a List of Bleach chapters (368–current) could be created. Wouldn't it require constant moves like the One Piece lists?Tintor2 (talk) 01:30, 12 June 2011 (UTC)Yes, chapters 188 through 367 in volumes 22 through 42 sounds right.The One Piece lists require constant moving? I wasn't aware of that. Is one move in several years too often in your book? Goodraise 02:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
List Of Bleach Volumes - Wikipedia
- Not really now that I think so. I'll give it a try in the evening. I'm sleepy right now.Tintor2 (talk) 03:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Now having an actual end of a story arc, it may be better to split it as such, and divide the second list as volumes 22-48. The two guidebooks MASKED&UNMASKED show there to be an official divide after chapter 423, Bells Are Blue/Bleach My Soul/The Vanishing Soul, and chapters 424+ are called Death Substitute Vanishment Arc by Shonen Jump's official website... what does everyone else think? Akata (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
webcitation[edit]
This doesn't seem to be working, I keep getting a medical related site Dandy Sephy (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Which one?Tintor2 (talk) 20:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- It seems something happened to the webarchive. I remember checking all of them.Tintor2 (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- I haven't had munch luck with webarchive anytime I've tried using it unfortunately. :( I was trying to use it for archiving some TV guide type sources and the links didn't work more than a few minutes. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 21:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Bleach Manga End
- Now the whole site is throwing a 403 Forbidden error. Wonder what happened to them...? 「ダイノガイ千？！」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 11:29, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Handily the reference style means the original links are still there, it certainly simplifies the process of changing to say, archive.org. Dandy Sephy (talk) 17:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
I think we should add again the poem/tagline section.[edit]
Add them under the appropriate volume. Y'know, like...
'Poem
'
or
'Poem
'
I'm not good at descriptions, just look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Bleach_chapters&oldid=220400643—Preceding unsigned comment added by Notshortbutchibi (talk • contribs) 22:56, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
- No. They violate copyright, do not add to the understanding of the topic, and are trivial at best. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 23:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Shouldn't Spanish titles have translations?[edit]
We can't assume every reader from wikipedia knows Spanish. Titles like 'Falta de Armonia', 'Mala Suerte' need an English translation in the same way that Japanese titles are translated in chapter lists. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 19:12, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Title reason[edit]
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Archive 51#Volumes or manga volumes for reason of the article's title.Tintor2 (talk) 01:03, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Bleach volumes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140505202945/http://ebookstore.sony.jp/item/ST000000000000000357/ to http://ebookstore.sony.jp/item/ST000000000000000357/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140505203339/http://ebookstore.sony.jp/item/ST000000000000000945/ to http://ebookstore.sony.jp/item/ST000000000000000945/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}(last update: 15 July 2018).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 15:02, 24 December 2017 (UTC)